signature pictures?

[phillyb]

y u no allowed?

[R2Limited]

This ^^^^

[ChrisJuliano]

Agreeeed :O Small ones needed:D

[MazRoadAdmin]

Will look into it later tonight.

[AntiochOG]

I hate sig pics. Keep them out.

[phillyb]

i generally hate them too, but if the post bit is big enough, then a small sig pic should be ok.
hell...i normally disable sigs altogether.

[revlimiter]

I'd like to at least be able to have my site banner in my sig. It helps me sell stuff and keep a roof over my head.

[MazRoadAdmin]

Will look into it later tonight.
Uh-huh.

Still gonna look into it later tonight.

[phillyb]

lol!!

[MazRoadAdmin]

Sigpic uploads enabled. 640x60 max, no animation. Banner ads will fit (forum sponsors only). Have fun.

[iRoadster]

With a 60 height limit there probably won't be too many sig pictures as that's pretty small.
Example
http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/hh279/iRoadster/P1050634-1-1-1.jpg

Not necessarily a bad thing, though some might say otherwise. I'm kinda indifferent about it.

[ChrisJuliano]

I think its meant for sponsors/business's mainly, which IMO is a perfect size.

If it is intended for everyone, id suggest atleast 150 tall.

[Skinny]

I like just the links, looks less clutered.

[MazRoadAdmin]

Can't please everyone. If you think about it, an awful lot of businesses manage to get their point across quite effectively in a 468x60 banner ad. All it takes is a little creativity.

I expect that we'll live with it like this for a while and see how it goes unless Randy thinks otherwise.

[Ron]

Size isn't an issue. It's all in how you use what you've got.

For an example, see below. \/ \/ \/