Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Less Fuel Consumption-Long,Slow Acceleration or Short and Fast?

  1. #1
    3,000 rpm - starting to feel the power treeafodo's Avatar
    Drives
    a rustbucket.
    Location
    Windsor, Ontario
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 97 Times in 61 Posts

    Less Fuel Consumption-Long,Slow Acceleration or Short and Fast?

    I've been wondering about this for the last little while and I'd like to see what other people think.

    Everyone thinks that taking it easy on the gas will make your mileage go up right? Well I've been thinking that if you accelerate at say 2,000 RPM for 30 seconds to get to a speed of 100 kph, or 60 mph, will that actually save more gas as to possibly accelerating at 3,500 or 4,000 RPM for 10-15 seconds to the same speed? Assume that after the acceleration you hold that speed for 60 mph at a steady 1,500 RPM.
    I'd like to say that the quicker, higher revving acceleration would save you more fuel than the longer, slower acceleration, but I just don't know. I also haven't done math on paper yet.
    Say all the variables are the same. Octane of the fuel, engine, injectors, tires, tire pressure, engine temp, air temp and even wind. Everything is the exact same. I'd like your thoughts, and if you'd like, even math in here too?
    Austin.
    Lexy (Little Hobo) - Transforming from Wreck to Race Car.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueiii View Post
    Your priorities seem a bit messed up to me, although that's because I try to get my lap times to decrease.

  2. #2
    Mod Squad
    Drives
    2016 Ceramic GT
    Location
    Bentonville, Arkansas
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    9,299
    Thanks Given
    2,077
    Thanked 2,453 Times in 1,354 Posts
    Here’s my thinking:

    Reasonable high speed yields better MPG than low speed. High RPM is bad for MPG. So get to your target speed briskly, not using terribly high RPMs and you’ll be getting overall better MPG.

    So, the more time you spend at your target speed the better.

  3. #3
    2,000 rpm - light wheelspin, no bog here!
    Drives
    VR 2004 MSM
    Location
    City of Sin
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    137
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin View Post
    the more time you spend at your target speed the better.
    This, get up to speed w/o going WOT, but get there quick, then stay there. Let off early if red lights ahead. You;'ll piss off all the idiots that like barreling towards a red

  4. #4
    3,000 rpm - starting to feel the power treeafodo's Avatar
    Drives
    a rustbucket.
    Location
    Windsor, Ontario
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 97 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: Less Fuel Consumption-Long,Slow Acceleration or Short and Fast?

    Quote Originally Posted by bigx5murf View Post
    This, get up to speed w/o going WOT, but get there quick, then stay there. Let off early if red lights ahead. You;'ll piss off all the idiots that like barreling towards a red
    I don't mean go WOT, I just mean, like the driver said, briskly getting up to speed. Not going flat out ans looking like an idiot in traffic.
    Austin.
    Lexy (Little Hobo) - Transforming from Wreck to Race Car.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueiii View Post
    Your priorities seem a bit messed up to me, although that's because I try to get my lap times to decrease.

  5. #5
    3,000 rpm - starting to feel the power maharaj's Avatar
    Drives
    angry
    Location
    Earth
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    898
    Thanks Given
    120
    Thanked 111 Times in 62 Posts
    Don't forget to coast when possible!

  6. #6
    3,000 rpm - starting to feel the power treeafodo's Avatar
    Drives
    a rustbucket.
    Location
    Windsor, Ontario
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 97 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: Less Fuel Consumption-Long,Slow Acceleration or Short and Fast?

    I forgot to include in the first post that I'm not asking this to try to improve fuel economy. I'm asking just out of curiosity.
    Austin.
    Lexy (Little Hobo) - Transforming from Wreck to Race Car.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueiii View Post
    Your priorities seem a bit messed up to me, although that's because I try to get my lap times to decrease.

  7. #7
    6,000 rpm - mere mortals would shift theothersawyer's Avatar
    Drives
    1994 Classic Red
    Location
    Newnan, Ga
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks Given
    1,167
    Thanked 1,498 Times in 734 Posts
    I have read that getting up to speed quickly, like 60% throttle is best.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •