Originally Posted by
kung fu jesus
Yes, I would change both. New clutch, new supporting systems, that is the reasoning. The way to tell if the slave is bad is to gently pull back the rubber boot that covers the slave's actuator (rod that comes out of it and goes to the clutch fork), to see if fluid comes out or is wet with fluid. This is telling you the slave is no longer sealing.
If your slave is good, but you are having difficulty bleeding it, or bad/hard shifts, your master is bad. Other telltale signs your master is bad are fluid in the firewall or area under the master in the engine bay. Sometimes there will be fluid in the back at the firewall where the clutch mechanicals go through the firewall. you would have to peek in the the pedal box area, up under the dash with a flashlight, maybe pull the carpet back a little.
The idea behind replacing them both is to prevent you from destroying your new clutch, including the price of the labor, and gearbox. A clutch master is ~$50-60, the slave about ~$10-20. Additionally, I would replace the rubber clutch line for peace of mind. Your '96 has a rubber line that is 20 years old now. A braided line would be an upgrade.
The symptoms for failing clutch hydraulics are hard gear changes, particularly while stopped (engine running), notchy shifts, soft clutch pedal. If they fail, it will be extremely difficult to move the car because you won't be able to disengage the clutch with the engine running.